當前位置

首頁 > 英語閱讀 > 雙語新聞 > 請舉一些被當作歷史“常識”但又不被歷史學家接受的例子

請舉一些被當作歷史“常識”但又不被歷史學家接受的例子

推薦人: 來源: 閱讀: 1.29W 次

The Romans had a high incidence of bulimia and/or hoMosexuality.

請舉一些被當作歷史“常識”但又不被歷史學家接受的例子
羅馬人厭食症和/或同性戀的發病率很高。。

Medi suits of armor reduced your range of motion so "if you can just knock a knight over he won't be able to get himself back up."

中世紀的盔甲會降低你的行動範圍,所以“如果你能擊倒一個騎士,他自己是站不起來的”。

Cleopatra/Jesus/Hannibal/Pharaoh was black.

埃及豔后/耶穌/漢尼拔/法老是黑人

History's marches riots protests and revolutions were ad hoc and driven by the poor and oppressed.

歷史上的遊行,暴動,抗議賀革命都是臨時的,由窮人和受壓迫的人領導的。

Most cannibals ate their captives.

大部分食人族會吃掉他們的俘虜。

The Mayans were peaceful and the Aztecs were bloodthirsty.

瑪雅人愛好和平,而阿茲特客人則嗜血。

These are just a few things off the top of my head that "everyone knows" and I was taught in many history classes but historians almost universally consider incorrect. What are other things "in the common knowledge" about history that historians almost universally consider untrue?

這些只是我頭腦中“大家都知道”的幾件事,我在許多歷史課上被教過,但歷史學家幾乎普遍認爲是錯誤的。歷史學家普遍認爲不真實的關於歷史的“常識”是什麼?

(I'd really love it if the answers weren't just negative or unsourced accusations about some famous character's "real motivations.")

我非常歡迎那些正面回答而且沒有某種原因故意歪曲事實的答案。