5分鐘教會你託福分數怎麼算

對於大家的託福備考來說，知道了託福的計分方式，我們就能更好地設計我們的答題策略，獲得更高的分數。而從託福官網上的一些信息我們都可以瞭解到，2016年新託福聽、說、讀、寫每部分滿分30分，共計120分。新託福80相當於老託福550分，新託福100相當於老託福600分。那麼，在以下內容中我們就爲大家介紹一下新託福各部分評分標準。

5分鐘教會你託福分數怎麼算

新託福聽力評分標準

在託福聽力考試中一共會6篇文章，34道題目，在6篇文章中所有回答正確的題目數量加起來就是你的託福聽力參考總分。在託福聽力表格題中，所有的項目都要回答正確，你纔算是拿到了總分。在雙項選擇題中，只有把兩個正確答案都選出來纔算拿到了總分，少選、多選或者誤選都不能拿到你的“point”。

新託福口語評分標準

託福口語考生的原始錄音答案由互聯網傳遞至ETS進行打分和評判。一個考生的六道口語題，會被至少兩位，最多三位考官評分。每道口語題會被一位考官給一個原始分(0-4 之間的整數分)。而具體評分標準則可以參加以下的表格。

新託福寫作評分標準

綜合寫作是託福寫作板塊中的其中一項。托福考試的寫作部分分爲綜合(Integrated writing)和獨立(Independent writing)兩塊，這兩塊分別獨立評分，取平均值後得到最終的分數。也就是說，這兩個部分各佔一半權重，因此應給予相同程度的重視。

六分：文章切題，闡說充分，文章有說服力;段落組織有序，銜接緊密，過渡自然，有很強的邏輯性;段落內句與句連接順暢，句式使用恰當，靈活，嫺熟;用詞確切，得體。文章中有個別語法拼寫錯誤，但不影響內容表達。

五分：文章切題，闡說基本充分，在某些細節上有缺陷。段落層次組織有序，銜接緊密，過渡自然，邏輯性強;句間連接順暢，句式使用恰當，靈活;用詞基本得體。文章中有少量用詞不當和語法拼寫錯誤。

四分：文章切題，闡說尚可，展開不夠。段落層次組織有序，銜接緊密，過渡自然，有邏輯性;句間連接基本順暢;有部分句法錯誤;用詞一般，有時不得體。詞性區分和拼寫等有若干錯誤。

三分：文章切題，段落組織基本合理，有邏輯性，但只存在於語義層次上，語言表達上未能體現;句子框架結構基本成立，但有許多語法錯誤，句間聯繫不順暢，往往是不善於使用邏輯連詞，顯得幼稚，生硬。詞彙方面拼寫錯誤多，常有用詞不得體現象。

二分：文章切題。闡說沒有展開，只限於三言兩語地回答問題;沒有段落組織，很亂，長度很短，只有一段;句子排列有一定的邏輯關係，能看出各句基本框架，但結構或語法錯誤較多;用詞不得體，拼寫錯誤多。

一分：文章各方面都有嚴重錯誤，句子不像句子。總體印象是根本沒有寫作能力，英語水平太低，夠不上二分標準，只能打最低分。

新託福閱讀評分標準

託福閱讀總共有3篇文章如遇到加試，則隨機3篇文章算分，另1篇文章不算分。每篇文章700個字，對應14道題目。其中，13道題是基礎信息和推斷題，每道題1分。最後一道題是小結題，俗稱大題，滿分2分。託福閱讀部分整體42道題，對應原始分數滿分45分。將會給出原始分數與最終分數的對應。託福閱讀滿分爲42至45分不等，轉換爲標準分後滿分爲30分。對於託福閱讀評分標準我們展現給大家一個表格進行詳細的瞭解下吧。

託福閱讀TPO30第2篇:The Pace of Evolutionary Change

【1】A heated debate has enlivened recent studies of evolution. Darwin's original thesis, and the viewpoint supported by evolutionary gradualists, is that species change continuously but slowly and in small increments. Such changes are all but invisible over the short time scale of Modern observations, and, it is argued, they are usually obscured by innumerable gaps in the imperfect fossil record. Gradualism, with its stress on the slow pace of change, is a comforting position, repeated over and over again in generations of textbooks. By the early twentieth century, the question about the rate of evolution had been answered in favor of gradualism to most biologists' satisfaction.

【2】Sometimes a closed question must be reopened as new evidence or new arguments based on old evidence come to light. In 1972 paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge challenged conventional wisdom with an opposing viewpoint, the punctuated equilibrium hypothesis, which posits that species give rise to new species in relatively sudden bursts, without a lengthy transition period. These episodes of rapid evolution are separated by relatively long static spans during which a species may hardly change at all.

【3】The punctuated equilibrium hypothesis attempts to explain a curious feature of the fossil record—one that has been familiar to paleontologist for more than a century but has usually been ignored. Many species appear to remain unchanged in the fossil record for millions of years—a situation that seems to be at odds with Darwin's model of continuous change. Intermediated fossil forms, predicted by gradualism, are typically lacking. In most localities a given species of clam or coral persists essentially unchanged throughout a thick formation of rock, only to be replaced suddenly by a new and different species.

【4】The evolution of North American horse, which was once presented as a classic textbook example of gradual evolution, is now providing equally compelling evidence for punctuated equilibrium. A convincing 50-million-year sequence of modern horse ancestors—each slightly larger, with more complex teeth, a longer face, and a more prominent central toe—seemed to provide strong support for Darwin's contention that species evolve gradually. But close examination of those fossil deposits now reveals a somewhat different story. Horses evolved in discrete steps, each of which persisted almost unchanged for millions of years and was eventually replaced by a distinctive newer model. The four-toed Eohippus preceded the three-toed Miohippus, for example, but North American fossil evidence suggests a jerky, uneven transition between the two. If evolution had been a continuous, gradual process, one might expect that almost every fossil specimen would be slightly different from every year.

【5】If it seems difficult to conceive how major changes could occur rapidly, consider this: an alteration of a single gene in files is enough to turn a normal fly with a single pair of wings into one that has two pairs of wings.

【6】The question about the rate of evolution must now be turned around: does evolution ever proceed gradually, or does it always occur in short bursts? Detailed field studies of thick rock formations containing fossils provide the best potential tests of the competing theories.

【7】Occasionally, a sequence of fossil-rich layers of rock permits a comprehensive look at one type of organism over a long period of time. For example, Peter Sheldon's studies of trilobites, a now extinct marine animal with a segmented body, offer a detailed glimpse into three million years of evolution in one marine environment. In that study, each of eight different trilobite species was observed to undergo a gradual change in the number of segments—typically an increase of one or two segments over the whole time interval. No significant discontinuous were observed, leading Sheldon to conclude that environmental conditions were quite stable during the period he examined.

【8】Similar exhaustive studies are required for many different kinds of organisms from many different periods. Most researchers expect to find that both modes of transition from one species to another are at work in evolution. Slow, continuous change may be the norm during periods of environmental stability, while rapid evolution of new species occurs during periods of environment stress. But a lot more studies like Sheldon's are needed before we can say for sure.

word "innumerable" in the passage is closest in the meaning to

tless.

sional.

e.

ated.

rding to paragraph 1, all of the following are true EXCEPT

in saw evolutionary change as happening slowly and gradually.

in the fossil record were used to explain why it is difficult to see continuous small changes in the evolution of species.

in's evolutionary thesis was rejected because small changes could not be observed in the evolutionary record.

the early twentieth century, most biologists believed that gradualism explained evolutionary change.

h of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage paragraph 2 ? Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information.

punctuated equilibrium hypothesis challenged gradualism, which holds that species evolve in relatively sudden bursts of brief duration.

punctuated equilibrium hypothesis developed by Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge was challenged in 1972 Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge challenged gradualism by positing that change from one species to another cannot occur without a lengthy transition period.

punctuate equilibrium hypothesis, in opposition to gradualism, holds that transitions from one species to another occur in comparatively sudden burst.

rding to paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, the punctuated equilibrium hypothesis and the gradualism hypothesis differed about

her the fossil record is complete.

her all species undergo change.

her evolution proceeds an a constant rate.

many new species occur over long periods of time.

rding to paragraph 3, the lack of intermediate fossils in the fossil record of some species

been extensively studied by paleontologist for over a century.

radicts the idea that most species have remained unchanged for millions of years.

lenges the view that evolutionary change is gradual.

most common in the fossil records of clam and coral species.

word "compelling" in the passage paragraph 4 is closest in the meaning to

rising.

uasive.

roversial.

iled.

graph 4 mentions that North American horses have changed in all the following ways EXCEPT in

number of toes they have.

length of their face.

r overall size.

number of years they live.

word "alteration" in the passage paragraph 5 is closest in meaning to

rfection.

acement.

ge.

ication.

rding to paragraph 7, Peter Sheldon's studies demonstrated which ofthe following about trilobites?

underwent gradual change over a long time period.

experienced a number of discontinuous transitions during their history.

remained unchanged during a long period of environmental stability.

evolved in ways that cannot be counted for by either of the two competing theories.

word "occasionally" in the passage paragraph 7 is closest in meaning to

ubtedly.

cally.

in a while.

some extent.

main purpose of paragraph 7 is to

ribe one test of the competing theories.

ide an example of punctuated equilibrium.

ribe how segmented animals evidence both competing theories.

ain why trilobites became extinct.

12. Look at the four squares [■] that indicate where the following sentence can be added to the e could the sentence best fit? They believe that environmental conditions may play a crucial role in determining which of the two modes will be in operation over a given period.

■【A】Similar exhaustive studies are required for many different kinds of organisms from many different periods. ■【B】Most researchers expect to find that both modes of transition from one species to another are at work in evolution.■【C】Slow, continuous change may be the norm during periods of environmental stability, while rapid evolution of new species occurs during periods of environment stress. ■【D】But a lot more studies like Sheldon's are needed before we can say for sure.

ctions: selected from the seven phrases below the phrases that correctly characterize punctuated equilibrium and the phrases that correctly characterize gradualism. Two of the phrases will not be used. This question is worth 3 points.

es that new species emerge from existing species during relatively brief period of time.

first formulated by Charles Darwin.

ain why North American horses have become smaller over time.

es that new species evolve slowly and continuously from existing species.

ain the lack of intermediate fossil forms in the fossil record of many species.

etition is usually strongest when the density of the competing populations is the same.

es that a species will not change unless its environment changes.

1 )

Gradualism

A B C D E F G

2 )

punctuated equilibrium

A B C D E F G

託福閱讀答案

merable是不可計數的，A是無數的，B是偶然的，C是大的，D是重複的。這個單詞是numerable加否定前綴，很容易就能推出意思來。

2.A答案對應第一段第二句， B對應第一段第三句，D對應一段最後一句。C與原文衝突，原文一直在說darwin理論被人們廣泛接受。

3.高亮句子的主幹部分是斷點平衡論挑戰了原來的漸進論，然後解釋了斷點平衡論的內容。A選項which修飾不明，容易產生誤解;B選項與原文矛盾，C與原文不符，原文S和N的觀點是change的發生是without lengthy transition的。D和原文意思相符，並且也包含了所有的主幹部分。

4.根據原文，漸進論是說物種演變是通過長時間的緩慢改變發生的;斷點平衡論是說物種演變是短期爆發的。所以選擇C，進化是否是勻速發生的。

5.根據lack of intermediate fossils定位到第三段倒數第二句，在往前看一句說，這一情況對於達爾文學說是不和的，而達爾文學說正是漸進論，這一段的最後也說原來的物種突然被替換，而不是漸漸進化改變的。所以C符合原文意思。 A與原文第一句破折號後矛盾，原文說這一現象一直被Ignored，B選項原文矛盾，該現象應該是反對了達爾文學說，支持了物種有長期不改變的論點。D雖然正確但是隻是本段的細節，不能表達主題，所以不選。

el本身是強迫，此處作爲evidence的形容詞可以延伸爲說服力強的。因此答案選B 有說服力的。A是驚奇的，C是有爭議的，D是細節的。都不沾邊。另外通過句義可以判斷，前文說馬的進化was once 是經典的漸進論的證明，is now(輕微轉折)提了"equally"怎麼樣的證據證明了點斷平衡論，前文既然說對gradual evolution很支持，那麼後文出現equally，那應該對點斷論也是有力證據。因此選B。

7.對應部分在第四段的第二句和第五句，只有D選項沒有出現。

8.這一句話說一個怎麼樣的單一基因就足以變一個普通飛禽的一對的正常翅爲兩對翅膀，所以有推理應該是要改變這個基因。所以選C，Alteration是修改，變更，A選項是不完美，B是替換，D是複製 帶入後都改變了原文的意思。

9.根據Peter Sheldon定位到原文第二句。後面對trilobites進行了描述，A選項對應了原文第三句，後文又繼續說沒有明顯的斷點。所以A正確。 B與原文第四句衝突。C與第三句衝突，D原文沒有這種說法。而且上文也表明它符合gradual evolvement。

sionally，是偶然偶爾的意思。A是毫無疑問的，B是基本上，C是偶爾有一次。D是在一定程度上。因此應該選C。並且上文提出問題說是否有過逐漸進化?那麼下文給的是一個逐漸進化的例子，所以應該是在表達偶爾有一兩個的意思。

11.上文說實地勘測會給competing theories提供test，第七段就給了試驗例子，那麼就證明是A正確。B與原文衝突，這個例子是支持漸進論的。C也不對，理由同上。D與原文目的不符。

12.首先句子開頭出現了They，那麼我們應該能在前文找到一個提到人物的地方，句子又提出environmental condition的作用，那麼後文應該會出現對這一理論的解釋，那麼C是符合的，也可以進行代入驗證。

13.A斷點平衡論論點爲物種變化發生突然，快速，符合。B對應文章第一段第一句話，符合漸進論。C與原文第四段第二句矛盾，原文說馬進化會變大。不選。D原文第一段第一句，符合漸進論。E對應原文第三段。符合點斷平衡論。F原文沒提到，不選。G原文最後一段，說漸進論應該會是環境比較穩定的情況下的進化規則。符合漸進論。

託福閱讀譯文

【1】最近的一個關於進化的研究引發了激烈的爭論。達爾文的原始論點和進化漸進主義者支持的觀點是物種會持續地改變，但非常緩慢，增量也很小。這種改變是普遍的，但是現在短時間的觀察是不能察覺的，並且，這個觀點聲稱，它們通常被掩蓋於不完美的化石記錄的不可計數的缺失中。漸進主義及其對物種緩慢變化的引力讓人欣然接受，並在世代的教科書中重複出現。在20世紀早前之前，令大部分的生物學家滿足於利用漸進主義來回答關於進化速率的問題。

【2】有時，已經有了結論的問題必須由在已有證據基礎上出現的新的證據和新的論點使其重新展開討論。在1972年，古生物學者Stephen Jay Gould和 Niles Eldredge用相反的論點挑戰了世俗的結論，即斷點平衡說，它假設了物種演變爲新的物種是通過相對突然的爆發，並非通過長時間的過渡時期。迅速的進化期被時間相對更長的靜態期分開，而在靜態時期，物種是幾乎完全不變的。

【3】斷點平衡論試着去解釋化石記錄的一個古怪的特點----在超過一個世紀的時間裏它已經爲古生物學者所熟悉，但一直被忽視。許多物種似乎在上百萬年的化石記錄中一直沒有改變，這個情況與達爾文的模型所支持的物種的持續變化相悖。進化漸進論的支持者所預測的中間狀態的化石一直沒有出現。在大部分蛤和珊瑚的聚集地，其化石在很厚的岩石中都實際上沒有變化，只是突然被另一新的並且不同的物種而取代。

【4】北美馬的進化曾經被用作經典的教科書案例來證明漸變進化論，現在卻爲斷點平衡學提供了同樣有說服力的證據。一個有說服力的5千萬年的馬祖先的進化模型----每一代都稍稍大一點，有更復雜的牙齒，更長的臉，和中間更突出的腳趾----這一切都看似強有力的支持了達爾文的論點，物種是逐步地進化的。但是，對這些化石更嚴謹的驗證現在揭示了一個不太一樣的故事。馬是在不連續的步驟中進化的，其中每個進化步驟中間都有上百萬年時間保持不變，在最後被一個不同的更新的模型取代。比如四隻腳趾的Eohippus 在三隻腳趾的moihippus之前，但北美化石證據表明在這之間有一個不平穩的，不均衡的轉換過程。如果進化一直都是連續，漸進的過程，人們應該預期到的是每年的化石樣本都會存在細微的差別。

【5】如果很難設想大的改變會迅速發生，想想這些：一個單一基因的改變就足以將有一對翅膀的蒼蠅變成兩對翅膀。

【6】關於進化速度的問題現在發生了轉變：進化過程是逐漸發生的麼，還是總是突然短時間的爆發?對含有化石的厚岩層的細緻的現場調查可以檢驗這兩個備受爭論的理論。

【7】偶爾，有一個系列的化石豐富的岩石可以允許人們綜合性的觀察一種生物在很長一段時間中的變化。比如，Peter Sheldon對於三葉蟲，一種已滅絕的身體分節的海洋生物，的研究提供了其對三百萬年來在同一海洋環境下進化的一些細節。研究中，八種三葉蟲都觀察到了其身體節數數量逐漸改變的過程，在整個時間段中，一般身體都增加了一到兩節。沒有明顯的不連貫，這使sheldon得出結論：海洋環境在那段時間是比較穩定的。

【8】很多來自不同時期的不同的生物都需要開展相似的相近研究。大多數研究者希望發現物種進化的這兩種模式都存在。緩慢的，連續的變化可能是在環境穩定的時間段下的規律，而快速進化的新物種則發生在環境變化時期的壓力下。但是，我們需要更多的想Sheldon所做的研究以證明這個觀點。