我們應該扼殺 “槍手”麼？Should We Kill the “Gunners”?

ing-bottom: 66.56%;">

I guess everyone are familiar with the meaning of the word gunner in China, it doesn’t mean one who are with a gun anymore, but means someone who sits for an examination in place for another person. When it comes to the gunner issue, different people have different opinion, some people think that is a form of dishonesty, while others argue that it is understandable that each takes what he needs. In my point of view, I agree with the former.
我猜中國人都熟悉槍手這個詞的意思，這不僅僅是拿着槍的人，也是在考場上幫人替考的人的意思。每當提到槍手問題，不同的人有不同的觀點，有些人認爲這是不誠實的行爲，然而有些人辯稱各取所需的可以理解的。在我看來，我同意前者。
In the first place, paying money to hire a gunner to pretend you to finish the exam is a very dishonesty behavior. Since you have decided to take the exam, then you have to study hard to prepare for it. And it feels very good when you pass the exam by the hard work you have done. Hence, cheating in the exam by this way is inadvisable.
第一，花錢請槍手替考是非常不誠實的行爲。既然你決定要去報考，那麼你就該努力學習備考。當你用自己的努力通過了考試，那種感覺超棒的。因此，像用這種方法在考場作弊是不可取的。
In the second place, hire a gunner is violating the exam rules, people who do this should be punished, both the employer and gunner. As a person who obey laws and rules, when someone want to pay you to be a gunner, you should rejected consciously. Or if the deal comes to light, the gunner also will have a stain on their credit record.
第二，請槍手是違反了考試規則的，做這種事的人應該受到懲罰，僱傭者和槍手都是。一個秉公守法的人在有人請自己做槍手的時候，應該自覺地回絕。不然這種交易一曝光，槍手的信用記錄也會有污點。
To conclusion, people should not hire someone to be a gunner, and others should reject the chance to be a gunner. We all have the responsibility to prevent this kind of thing from happening.
總而言之，人們不該請槍手，其他人也該決絕當槍手。我們都有防止這種事情發生的責任。