停止匆忙做決定的3個原因
3 Reasons to Stop Rushing to Decisions
停止匆忙做決定的3個原因At most companies, the best time to make a decision is yesterday. The problem, of course, is that making good choices takes time. If you're having trouble fighting a corporate culture that puts a premium on speed over quality, here are a few things to keep in mind. Some might even persuade the boss to give you the extra time you need to do things right.
在大多數公司，做決定的最好時間是昨天。但問題是明智的決定都是需要時間的。如果你難以與公司重速度輕質量的企業文化抗衡的話，你可以記住下面幾點。也許有人會說服老闆給你更多的時間好好完成任務。If you (or your bosses) value quick decisions over good ones, you run these risks:
如果你（或者你的老闆）更重視決定的速度而不是質量，那麼你可能會遇到這些問題：
1. Deciding, without having all the facts on hand.
1.在沒有掌握全部資料之前做決定Data gathering and research require an investment of time, in part because they often require tracking down stakeholders on related projects or experts on a given issue. And good luck to you if you're trying to get answers between Memorial Day and Labor Day, or any time from Thanksgiving until the New Year.
數據收集和研究需要一定的調查時間,在某種程度上是因爲研究人員往往需要設法找到相關項目的股東或者某一特定問題的專家.如果你想在陣亡將士紀念日和勞動節之間或者感恩節和春節之間找到答案的話,那麼只能是祝你好運了。If you skip over this step without reaching all the involved parties -- or at least the temporary replacement they've hopefully brought up to speed -- you could find yourself making a bad choice for lack of information. That could lead to wasted time and money down the line, and the embarrassment of being forced to reverse your position.
如果你省略掉了收集資料這一步，而且沒有與所有的相關人羣取得聯繫或者與他們所需的暫時替代人員取得聯繫，就很快做出決定，那麼你會發現自己的選擇因爲信息缺失而很糟糕。那將完全是浪費時間和金錢，而且會導致不得不轉換位置的尷尬。
Academics and authors Chip Heath and Dan Heath recently addressed this issue in their book Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work. Marina Krakovsky at Stanford's Graduate School of Business explains:
專業學者與作家奇普希思與丹希思最近在他們的書籍《決定：如何在生活和工作中做出更好的選擇》中提到了這一問題。斯坦福商學院的瑪麗娜克拉科夫斯基解釋說：Unlike good scientists, who test hypotheses to see if they're right, most of us tend to look for evidence that simply confirms our preconceptions. Because this "confirmation bias" leads us back to where we started, rather than toward better choices, it's an enemy of good decision making...
優秀的科學家一般是通過測試猜想來判斷自己是否正確，大多數人卻與他們不同，我們大部分都是試圖尋找證據來簡單地確認我們的偏見。因爲這種“確認偏見”會致使我們回到開始的地方，而不是幫助我們做出更好的選擇，所以它是做出良好決定的敵人……3. You risk burnout.
3.你會精疲力竭Technology giveth and technology taketh away, especially when it comes to time management. In the olden days, you might be required to stay "on" for eight or so hours a day. Now, even if you're allowed to go home, you're expected to check your email and make decisions.
科技會給與，也會索取，尤其是涉及到時間管理的時候。在過去的日子裏，公司或許會要求你每天工作8小時左右。現在，即使你回家了，你還得查收郵件並做出決定。One common defense raised by managers when reports complain about having to check email after hours is that it's not real work -- it's just checking in. But once you're changing the course of a project or allocating resources in a meaningful way, you're working.
當有報道指責員工回家之後還得花很長時間看郵件的時候，經理們提出的一個普遍抗議就是：查看郵件並不是真正的工作，那隻不過是看看罷了。但是當你開始採用有意義的方法來改變項目流程或者分配資源的時候，你就是在工作了。In reality, most decisions you're asked to make after you've left the office are not life or death. In that case, it makes sense to wait until the next day, when you'll have better access to information and a clear head. If you never get a chance to stop choosing, your choices will suffer.
實際上，在你離開辦公室之後，公司要求你做的決定並不是生死攸關的。在這種情況下，當你還沒有獲得信息，頭腦也不清醒的時候，最好還是等到第二天再處理。如果你從來沒有機會停止選擇，那麼你的選擇將會很糟糕。Tell Us What You Think
告訴我們你的看法Does your corporate culture value speed over quality?
你們公司的文化是不是重速度輕質量呢？
