高考英語作文範文公園應該收門票嗎
親愛的編輯，
我想向您介紹我們曾經對是否入會費收費應爲公園的討論你。我們60％的同學認爲入場費不符合人民的期望，爲一個公園被認爲是一個地方，市民可以有一個良好的時候，他們不在家或在工作繁忙。如果入會費必須用於支付公園的遊客，有必要建立一個大門和圍牆。在最後一個城市將在一個壞的外觀。我們40％的同學認爲入場費可以接受，但不能過於昂貴。從門票銷售的錢可以用來支付在公園的園丁，購買鮮花和樹木等種。
至於我自己，我認爲入場費是有用的，因爲它可以用來保護公園。我們是否有同感，親愛的編輯器？
此致
李華
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should not be bought before one enters a park, for it is a place for the public to go to when they are free. If a ticket must be bought, a gate and walls have to be built for a park, which will make a city look ugly. Forty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should be bought before one enters a park, but that the price of the ticket should be reasonable. Money that is got from ticket selling can be used to pay the gardening workers and buy different kinds of flowers and trees. As for myself, I really think parks are good places to go to at weekends and on holidays. At the same time, we, as visitors, should pay the entrance fee when we enter a park. After all, it takes a lot of money to maintain a park in good working order. Do you aGREe with me, dear editor?
Yours truly,
Li Hua
親愛的編輯，
我想向您介紹我們曾經對是否入會費收費應爲公園的討論你。 60出100認爲入場費不應購買學生前一進入公園，因爲它是一個公共場所去時，他們都是免費的。如果一票，必須買的，一門和牆壁都必須爲一個公園，這將使城市建成外觀難看。 40出100認爲入場費應該買一個學生進入公園前，但該票價格應是合理的。錢是從售票了可用於支付園藝工人和購買各種花卉和樹木。至於我自己，我真的覺得公園是好去處於週末和節假期 My Holiday'>假日。同時，我們作爲遊客，應支付入會費，當我們進入一個公園。畢竟，它需要大量的資金，以維持一個良好的工作秩序公園。你是否同意我的，親愛的編輯器？
此致
李華
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee should not be forced on the public. they believe parks are the place where the public enjoy themselves at their leisure. they think that a gate and wails are to be built if an entrance fee is to be charged. the city will not look so beautiful as it should have. Forty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee is OK, but it shouldn’t be out of control. Entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new types of flowers and trees. For myself, I’d like to say that if we all work hard to build our city into a flower garden, who cares about the entrance fee for parks?
Yours truly,
Li Hua
親愛的編輯，
我想向您介紹我們曾經對是否入會費收費應爲公園的討論你。我的同學百分之六十是認爲入場費不應強迫市民的想法。他們認爲公園是公共的地方享受自己的閒暇。他們認爲，一個門和哭聲，是一個入口，如果要收取費用建成。這個城市將不再看起來那麼美麗，因爲它應該有。我的同學百分之40的想法是一個入場費是美好的，但它不應該失去控制。入會費可以用來支付園丁和購買鮮花和樹木的新類型。至於我自己，我想說，如果我們都努力建設成爲一個花園，誰在乎公園入場費爲我們的城市？
此致
李華
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Those against charging entrance fee for parks take up 60%. they are of one mind that parks are a place for the public’s enjoyment. If tickets are demanded on the visitors of a park, a gate has to be set up and so have the walls on the four sides. If so, city will not look as beautiful as it would. Otherwise, those in favour of charging entrance fee for parks take up 40%. they all think that ticket price should be controlled properly, and that entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new sorts of flowers and trees. the truth lies in the hands of the majority. Does my argument stand to reason, dear editor?
Yours truly,
Li Hua
親愛的編輯，
我想向您介紹我們曾經對是否入會費收費應爲公園的討論你。對公園門票收費者佔60％。他們是一記，公園是爲市民享用。如果門票公園的遊客要求，一門要成立，所以對四面牆壁。如果是這樣，城市將不再像它看起來會漂亮。否則，在收費停車場佔40％，贊成的入場費。他們都認爲，門票價格應適當控制，而且門票可以用於支付購買的園丁和新種類花卉和樹木。真理掌握在多數人的手中。難道我的論點立場的原因，親愛的編輯器？
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Of all us who have joined in the discussion, 60% share the point of view that an entrance fee should not be charged while 40% share the opposite view. Those who don’t aGREe with the idea think that a park is a place where the public can spend their spare time for pleasure. Those in support of the idea think that entrance fee for parks can’t be beyond control. Those against the idea think that a city’s appearance will be damaged because a gate and wails will be built if an entrance fee is to be collected. Those who aGREe with the idea think entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new kinds of flowers and trees. I think it does more good than harm to charge an entrance fee for parks. Am I right, editor?
Yours truly,
Li Hua
此致
李華
親愛的編輯，
我想向您介紹我們曾經對是否入會費收費應爲公園的討論你。在所有我們誰也加入了討論，60％的份額的角度來看，一個入口不應收取費用，而40％的市場份額則持相反意見。這些誰不同意這一觀點認爲，公園是一個地方，市民可以用自己的業餘時間爲樂趣。在支持這種想法的人士則認爲對公園門票不能失控。反對的人士則認爲，一個城市的面貌將受到損害，因爲一門和啼哭聲，必定會入場費是要收集興建。這些誰認同這個認爲入場費可用於支付園丁和購買鮮花和樹木新種。我覺得它更利遠大於弊，爲公園收取門票。我說得對，編輯？
此致
李華
