雅思寫作動物醫藥實驗話題解析
爲了讓大家對雅思寫作中動物醫藥實驗這類話題能夠得心應手，下面小編給大家整理了一些此類話題的相關解析。
雅思寫作話題素材:動物醫藥實驗
1. Animals are sometimes used in order to assess the effect of medicines and cosmetics on humans, but to what extent are they j necessary?
動物通常被用於測試人類醫藥和化妝品的效果，在多大程度上言他們是必要的?
2. The most common argument against such experiments is that they are cruel.
反對這種實驗最常用的論據是他們太殘酷了。
3. Cruelty suggests that the animals used in the experiments undergo some kind of pain, discomfort or deformity.
殘酷意味着這些實驗中用到的動物需要承受一些痛苦，不適，或者變成殘疾。
4. This is understandably upsetting to many, who imagine the rabbit, mouse or frog that they cared for as a child having to endure such things.
對於那些把飼養的小動物如兔子，老鼠或青蛙視爲小孩子一樣照料的人們來說，聽到這些動物要遭受這樣的痛苦，感到悲痛是可以理解的。
5. The fewer cosmetic products people use, the fewer animals they have to slaughter.
人們用的化妝產品越少，屠殺的動物也會越少。
6. I do not think of a single item of toiletry which would justify pain or death to an animal.
我想不出任何一種化妝用品能證明動物(在實驗中)經受的痛苦甚至死亡是有合理的。
7. There should be a body to monitor such experiments, paid for by the companies and organizations conducting them.
需要有一個團體要監控這類實驗，費用由進行此類實驗的公司和機構支付。
8. It is an undeniable fact that animals play a vital role in maintaining the subtle balance of the earth’s ecological system.
動物在維持地球生態平衡上扮演着重要的角色，這是一個不可否認的事實。
9. The gaining of first-hand knowledge aid information about certain species provides adequate justification for continuing the killing of animals in laboratories.
獲得關於某一物種的第一手知識與信息，成爲繼續在實驗室殺害動物的合理辯護理由。
10. The protection of human beings from certain epidemics at the cost of lives of some animals justifies the work of researchers.
以一些動物的生命爲代價是爲了保護人類免受傳染病之害，這也成爲維護研?a href="">咳嗽貝死喙ぷ韉謀鞝省?/p>
11. They cite the accumulated knowledge about those animals as contributing to their survival.
他們舉證說明逐漸積累起來的關於這些動物的知識也會爲它們的生存做出貢獻。
12. For the people who wish to see the legal prohibition of such experiments, animal rights, especially the right to exist on the same planet with human beings, is always at the top of their list.
對於那些希望法律禁止此類動物實驗的人來說，動物權益，尤其是動物與人類生活在同一星球上的權利，是他們的首要論據。
13. They worry about species that are already on the verge of extinction.
他們擔心那些瀕臨滅絕的物種。
雅思寫作題目解析：動物醫藥實驗
Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicines
intended for human use. Others, however, think it is not right to do that.
Discuss both of these views and give you own opinion.
有人認爲小動物實驗對於人類有益，有認爲人們沒有權利用動物實驗，討論兩種觀點，給出你的意見?
思路拓展：
反對小動物實驗：
1. 生命是平等的，不該傷害小動物;小動物的基本生存權利不可被剝奪。
2. 從道德角度看是不對的;小動物實驗不道德，很殘忍。
3. 小動物實驗如果合法化，這種權利可能會被濫用。
支持小動物實驗：
1. 科學家把科技的進步歸結給爲實驗做出了巨大貢獻的小動物們;因爲用動物實驗便於觀察小動物，小動物在一些方面和人類是有共性的。
2. 小動物實驗減少了臨牀實驗的可能，對於新藥的研發推廣有重要的意義;(藥品;化妝品;化學產品)
原創語料庫：
1. Animal experimentation will enable people to know more about themselves,
for there are many similarities between human race and animals. Therefore, the
results of scientific research can help people to get further knowledge about
mankind. 實驗的結果可以幫助人們更多的瞭解人類。
2. Every year, a great many animals undergo painful suffering or death
because of scientific research into the effects of drugs, food additives and
other chemical products. 每一年，由於研發藥品，化妝品和其他的化學產品，很多小動物經歷了痛苦和死亡。
3. Scientists owe medical advances to the animals which make substantial
contributions to the experiment. 科學家把醫療的進步歸結給爲實驗做出了巨大貢獻的小動物們。
4. minimize the frequency of clinic experimentation v 減少了臨牀實驗的頻率。
5. Virtually, animal experiment is an abuse of animal life and an obvious
violation of the basic right of subsistence.
實際上，動物實驗是對動物的生命的踐踏，是對動物的基本生存權利的公然侵犯。
6. Consequently, animal experiment is immoral and an act of cruelty.
因此小動物實驗是不道德的，是一種殘忍的行爲。
7. A heated debate springs up as to whether or not animal experimentation
should be conducted. 人們就是否應該進行動物實驗展開了激烈的爭論。
8. I cannot accept the fact that many pitiful animals are used in finding
cure for some infectious diseases. 我不能接受無數可憐動物被用來找尋傳染病的治療方法。
9. Animal should receive better care and treatment. 動物應該得到更好的照顧和待遇。
10. Human scientific research, in which animals are subjected to various
experiments should be also condemned. 人類的科學研究拿動物來進行各種實驗，這一點應該受到譴責。
雅思寫作大作文高分範文：關於動物實驗
題目：
Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
中文翻譯：
現在動物實驗被廣泛用於開發新藥物和測試其他產品的安全性。 有些人認爲這些實驗應該被禁止，因爲它在道德上是錯誤的，導致動物受苦，而其他人贊成他們，因爲他們對人類的好處。
討論這兩種觀點，並給出自己的意見。
範文：
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a
necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
(270 words, band 9)
雅思寫作範文：動物實驗真的必要嗎?
Some people think animal experiments should be stopped because they are too cruel. Others think they are necessary for the development of sciences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
題目講評：
果然又是老題換個形式之後再出，題目考前給同學講解過的(到北京來講課了，但還是總收到長沙A類和G類同學們的來信，說拿到了好分數很高興。我也很想念你們!)這類文章想素材當然用咱們思考素材四類方法當中的綜合法，相加得出觀點：動物實驗應該繼續，但是要儘可能減小動物的痛苦。相應的寫四段，大正小負，當然還是小的放在前面寫。還是那句話，考IELTS學術類寫作想拿高分或者滿分永遠只要按照English academic writing的規則寫英文八股文就成。
1 開頭段(不少於4句);2 有一些動物實驗確實cruel(五句);3 但是一些領域的研究又不能缺少動物實驗(七句);4 綜合，得出結論(不少於3句)。創作全程使用IELTS作文cold storage冷處理+assembly line裝配法，給自己規定從開始寫25分鐘內要貼上Google。
高分關鍵詞：friends or foes 或敵或友 subject(vt) animals to experimentation拿動物去做實驗unjustifiable站不住腳的,不合適的 necessitate 使……成爲必需callous殘酷的 confinement 囚禁 veterinary 動物醫療 vaccination 接種 vivisection 活體解剖 rodent 指老鼠那一類動物 primate 靈長類 pragmatic 靈活的追求實效的(pragmatism也是美國人最大的特徵)pharmaceutical companies製藥公司anthropological and genetic 人類學的和基因學的analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs醫學當中鎮痛最常用的三種方法
Animals were friends or foes of humanity at different times of the human history. In modern times, experiments upon animals have long been a breeding ground for spirited debate. Some animal activists argue that we should ban animal experiments altogether because subjecting animals to experimentation is unjustifiable on moral grounds. Yet some other people contend that the advancement of science necessitates animal testing. Personally, I believe both their views have merit and demerit.
Granted, empirical evidence suggests that many animal experiments are performed callously without any heed to the discomfort or pain that laboratory mammals endure. First and foremost, improper confinement of test animals such as locking them up in cramped cages or poor veterinary is inhumane can gravely disrupt natural biological functions of the test animal. Further, the effects of vaccination and vivisection conducted on live rodents, primates and other lab mammals can be gruesome and chilling. They may, in some cases, even constitute sheer torture of live animals.
However, from a more pragmatic perspective, evidence is mounting that animal experimentation is still largely a necessary evil and there is no practical alternative for it at this point. In the first place, it is manifest that drug experimentation on live mammals is far more effectual than experimentation on bacteria or on other lower species in testing drug safety. Drugs that have severe potential side effects on homo sapiens must be tested by pharmaceutical companies on live mammals first to ascertain their toxicity. In the second place, in space research, live animals are still the only viable alternative to humans in testing living creature reaction to outer-space experience on a flight not considered to be sufficiently safe for human astronauts. Lastly, lab research about the behavioral tendencies of chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and other members of the primate group is also necessary. It produces valuable outcomes consistently advancing anthropological and genetic studies.
To conclude, I concede that experiments upon animals may induce suffering to the test animals. However, I am convinced that there are no feasible alternatives to this methodology at the current stage of scientific development. On balance , I think that we should allow animals testing to be continued but at the same time use techniques such as analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs to minimize the pain inflicted upon the test animal and augment the general welfare of these animals.
