新GRE作文高頻題有用嗎

推薦人：來源: 閱讀: 2.19K 次大中小

新GRE作文高頻題有用嗎?相信大家都很想知道，下面小編就給大家分享一下1

新GRE作文高頻題有用嗎

Q: 新GRE作文高頻題有用嗎?

A: 新GRE作文高頻題有用嗎?肯定有用，看高頻可以減低考生的工作量(也就是不需要把100多道題目都看完)，如果在考試的時候遇到高頻題目，而正好寫過的話，那麼分數就是有保證的。或者，至少比寫一篇完全沒有看過的文章要強。

如果我們把這些同學的看法當做一個論證的過程來找找其中的邏輯問題的話，大家就能明白爲什麼說“高頻只是個傳說了”。

在這個論證過程中，同學首先假設了一個前提，就是“寫一篇已經寫過的文章得到高分的可能性大於寫一篇沒有寫過的文章”。可是，我們考慮一下，如果本身這篇文章從一開始按照這個同學的分析思路，包括寫作的語言就存在巨大問題的話，那麼，即使是考試的時候照着抄一遍，分數也仍然會是很低的。因此，只有當你的寫作思路正確，分析過程正確，語言表達正確這幾個條件都滿足的時候，對於題目的熟練程度，或者是否寫過某個題目的作文，纔會影響到最後的分數。當然，我們還同時忽略了考場上的臨場狀態的變化問題。

反之，如果一個考生有正確的分析思路和寫作思路，有比較好的語言表達能力，那其實考試的時候是否寫過某個題目就變得不重要了，因爲最終他的能力會很好地解決題目熟悉程度的問題。比如我們所熟悉的高考語文中進行的作文測試，我們實際上是完全不知道考試會出現什麼題目的，我們平時練習的時候，也基本上不會考慮考試的時候是否會遇到同樣的題目，但是最終，寫作能力比較好，思維方式比較正確，知識面比較寬的同學往往會在作文中得到高分。從這個角度來看，實際上在準備作文的過程中，練習的題目是否是高頻並不重要，而重要的是，是否通過練習形成了正確的分析思路，寫作思路，並且讓語言的表達正確。

其次，很多人也認爲“高頻”題目在考試時被抽到的可能性更大，並且還有人會計算題目出現的概率。爲了讓大家都能看明白，我不會在這裏建立一個模型來計算什麼題目出現的概率較大，我們只考慮如下的一些問題。首先，ETS在從開放題庫中抽取題目給考生的時候，是一種隨機的選擇方式，那麼，每個題目被抽取到的概率是完全一樣的。而現在並沒有證據表明ETS在抽取題目的時候採用了任何優先級策略，所以我們不能對此作出主觀假設。第二，從目前的高頻統計方式來看，存在着很大的漏洞。據我所瞭解的情況，基本上是部分考生在考試結束後，在一些論壇或者BBS上發帖子，來說自己考到了什麼題目，然後由一些熱心的網友來進行人工統計，最後得到了所謂的“高頻”題目。

大家不妨計算一下每天有多少人去參加GRE的作文考試，一年下來又有多少人蔘加作文考試，其中在網上發佈題目的人的比例有多少，而發佈出來的題目被統計的又有多少。如果這些數據本身都沒有確切值的話，那麼統計的樣本首先就是存在問題的。而“高頻”的出現，很可能是“馬太效應”的結果，即在很長一段時間裏面，A題目被大多數人關注，於是成爲了“高頻”的一部分，於是，有人考到了這個題目，在網上發了帖子，那麼這個題目的關注度繼續上升。而那些“低頻”的題目，即使有人發了，也沒人去關注，但是很可能在一段時間後，某個“低頻”的題目其實出現的頻率很高了，但是卻依然沒有人去關注它。因此，要想得到科學的統計，必須有一個平臺，來隨時完整統計大多數人在考試中遇到的題目的情況，並且實時更新，才能得到較爲準確的數據。

因此，在備考GRE作文的過程中，其實是否準備網絡流傳的“高頻”題目並不重要，而重要的是，無論準備什麼題目，都能有正確的思考路徑和分析方法，並且能夠用正確的語言來表達自己的想法。當系統化的思維方式和準確的語言表達習慣形成的時候，無論什麼題目都沒有問題。

此外，如果希望消除題目熟練度的影響，大量閱讀題目，並且寫作提綱是必要的，其中也包括對題目的分析和簡單的邏輯結構梳理。

總之，要正確看待新GRE作文高頻題，利用高頻話題的主要作用是：(1)學會快速形成行文邏輯併產生相應的模板(2)學會快速化套路化地展開分支觀點(3)固定觀點表達的段落、事例表述的段落都事先準備好，上場直接默寫。

新gre作文題目之高頻題目彙總

1. The way Students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is More of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things.

2. As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious.

3. There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires.

4. Students should memories facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little.

5. In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information.

6. The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.

7. Critical judgment of work, in any given field has little value unless comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

小編也給大家整理出了GRE作文高頻題目之經典句式，考生可以參考使用。

1、The more…the more…句式的使用。人們越幸福，社會越穩定啦、等等

2、還有一些比較常用的：There is no denying that…/ there is no doubt that…

3、疑問句。用於開頭，來個設問句，在自問自答，提出自己觀點;用於段中，比如舉設想的例子：Can you imagine that…?/ How can one imagine…?

4、強調句的使用：It is people who…/ it is something that…

5、當你想表達“如果怎麼怎麼樣，就是另外一種情況”—虛擬語氣。爲什麼不來個虛擬倒裝?Were(Had) it…，something would......

GRE寫作滿分範文1

"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educators'?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."?

There?are?many?school?violences?in?each?school.??Those?are?big?problems?to?our?govenment?and?social.??School?violences?effect?the?studying?of?students.??This?is?very?serious,?even?some?students?are?nervious?to?go?school.??In?fact,?the?government?must?give?students?a?clean?place?to?study.??Teachers?should?help?students?know?it?is?a?duty?to?study.??So,?everyone?should?face?those?big?problems.?

Do?we?know?what?are?students'?ideas???Do?the?educators?try?to?know???Most?educators?hope?the?govenment?can?give?students?more?and?help?them?more.??These?are?people's?hope.??But?it?is?so?unfortunate?that?students?can't?have?a?good?place?to?study.??Also,?teachers?have?to?teach?the?students.??Not?that?students?can?know?what?to?study?by?themself.??In?the?compus,?there?are?many?guys?sell?the?drugs?and?acohol?to?younger?students.??Why?those?guys?can?go?into?the?school???That?is?also?the?main?problem.?

When?we?were?little,?we?didn't?know?what?is?correct?and?what?is?wrong.??So?we?lose?ourself?easily.??At?the?same?time,?we?need?much?care?from?parents?and?teachers.??So?our?teachers?and?parents?play?the?important?roles?and?they?own?must?do?better.??Because?some?students?learn?some?bad?habits?from?their?teachers?and?parents.???

If?we?want?to?resolve?all?the?problems,?we?must?face?the?problems?and?find?out?the?reasons,?then?try?to?resolve?them.??We?also?must?care?all?students.??If?we?can?help?them,?tring?to?do?our?best.??Then,?the?problems?will?become?less?and?less.????????????????????????

COMMENTARY?

This?is?a?seriously?flawed?response?to?the?topic.??The?writer?begins?by?discussing?school?violence?and?the?need?for?a?good?place?to?study,?parental?and?teacher?influence,?and?resolution?of?school?problems.??The?issue?of?who?should?determine?the?curriculum,?teachers?or?students,?is?implied?but?not?addressed?directly.??In?fact,?teacher-directed?learning?seems?to?be?a?small?point?in?a?series?of?concerns?related?to?school?violence.??The?development?of?a?position?on?the?issue?is?unfocused?and?disorganized.??Even?the?example,?drug?selling,?relates?to?school?violence?and?not?to?curricular?responsibility.?

Language?errors?are?numerous.??Problems?with?correct?use?of?tense,?diction,?word?order,?sentence?structure,?and?subject-verb?agreement?also?interfere?with?meaning.??Had?the?writer?not?included?references?to?teachers?helping?students?know?what?to?study,?the?essay?would?probably?have?received?a?score?of?1?instead?of?a?2.

GRE寫作滿分範文2

Today?some?educators?place?much?emphasis?on?what?students?want,there?is?a?conflict?about?what?is?the?educator's?duty?for?what??educatee?should?get.?

Normally,?the?college?or?university?in?our?country?,students?just?study?what?they?are?tought,it?is?the?professor's?duty?to?dermine?what?should?appear?in?the?ay?china?has?taken?the?polices?of?opening?reforming,every?thing?chang?ents?can't?get?the?job?position?from?goverment?authority?but?must?look?for?the?work?chance?by?themself?,so?students?have?taken?great?care?to?what?they?learn?int?the?college?and?what?kind?of?knowlege?does?the?job?market??high?education?institute?ignore?this?chang?and?keep?the?tranditional?teaching?method,it?will?seem?as?wast?student's?time?and?money?and?the?colleges?will?lost??their?student.?

It?may?be?the?best?way?for?the?developing?country?to?reform?their?high?education?system,?especially?with?those?majors?that?closely?connected?with?market?or?industry??give?our?student??most?upcoming?technolegy?or?skill?to?meet?the?need?of?outdoor?of?our?college,the?information?from?students?may?be?the?best?reference?for?the?educator?to?determine?what?they?should?take?to?the?classroom.??

COMMENTARY?

This?essay?displays?little?ability?to?develop?and?organize?a?coherent?response?to?the?topic.?

The?essay?takes?the?position?that?China?needs?to?reform?its?traditional?approach?to?curriculum?by?becoming?more?student?centered?and?technologically?current.??However,?the?reader?has?to?work?hard?to?decipher?the?generally?confusing?line?of?reasoning,?which?does?not?obviously?address?the?central?issue?presented?in?the?topic.?

There?is?an?attempt?to?organize?the?argument?into?a?three-paragraph?essay,?but?the?one-sentence?introduction?is?simply?a?variation?of?the?topic?statement.??The?brief?body?of?the?essay?does?not?advance?an?opinion?in?a?coherent?manner,?and?the?final?paragraph?shifts?the?focus?to?the?need?for?technology?in?the?curriculum.?

The?errors?(comma?splices,?misspellings,?verb?problems,?etc.)?are?so?intrusive?that?coherence?remains?a?problem.?

This?essay?would?need?considerable?rewriting?in?order?to?earn?a?higher?score?than?1.