雅思寫作開頭模板之大作文首段寫法詳解
大作文要求字數至少達到250字，在寫作中考慮到字數的合理安排，第一段最好寫3-5句話，大約40字左右，並且切忌在第一段就掏心掏肺把什麼話都說完。接下來請看本站帶來的雅思內容：雅思寫作開頭模板之大作文首段寫法詳解
雅思寫作開頭模板之大作文首段寫法詳解
作文的首段通常由以下幾方面組成：
1) 場景或背景信息，即題目中出現的phenomenon。
2) 一些人的觀點(some people’s opinion)，這部分在改寫文章首段時可要可不要，考生可按照自己的情況來安排。
3) 個人觀點，這一部分在有些文章的開首段中也可以不要。
大作文開首方式通常有以下兩種情況：
1) 題目中包含了背景信息(phenomenon)，有時也出現一些人的觀點，並且題目中字數較多。這種情況下最保險的辦法是將題目中的背景信息及一些人的觀點重新表達(paraphrase)，可以做:● 主動語態<=>被動語態● 主謂賓<=>主系表● 某些近義詞互換Example:At present, it is hard for college students to find jobs. Many people claimthat college teachers should give priority to practical courses like computer science and business over such traditional ones as history and geography. To what extent do you agree?→ The number of college graduates is surging while a substantial proportion of them have difficulties in finding employment after their graduation. Numerous people blame this on the university education and believe that more emphasis should be laid on practical courses such as computer science and business thanon traditional courses like history and geography. 其後再加考生自己的觀點即可。
2) 題目中包含了背景信息，有時出現一些人的觀點，但題目中字數較少，若直接重新表達，字數湊不到40字左右。這種情況下推薦把籠統信息細節化即通過舉例來解釋說明題目中的背景信息的開首方式來保證字數。總之，合理的開頭段可以包括背景介紹、點明話題、闡明觀點，2-3句話，40-60字，5分鐘內完成。
雅思寫作高級短語之13個表示建議的句型
1. My suggestions is as follows
2. The following suggestions should be taken into consideration when we are seeking solutions to the problem.
3. In view of the above, I think some urgent measures need to be taken to solve this problem.
4. According to the above analyses, I would recommend that some urgent steps should be taken to put an end to the serious problem.
5. In view of the seriousness of this problem, effective measures should be taken before things get worse.
6. One way out is …
7. It will be advantageous / helpful/ profitable/ beneficial if
8. It is wise for … to do sth.
9. A second/ another solution/ suggestion is that
10. Another way of solving this problem is to
11. is one of the best approaches/ weapons / ways / solutions.
12. should, have to, must, ought to, be supposed to
13. For one thing, great efforts have to be made to … and for another …
雅思寫作範文：遵守社會法律規範
Task:Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
思路解析：
應該遵守：法律和法規是社會有序運行的前提，它們規範了人們的行爲和思想，讓人們的活動能限制在一個安全的，合法的範圍。相反，一旦人們恣意妄爲地來忽略這些法律的話，整個社會會陷入混亂。舉例，如果交通法規不被遵守，則會出現大量的車禍。如果刑法不被遵守的話，則會出現大量的社會犯罪。
不應該遵守：對於那些不公正的法律，人們應該被授予足夠的自由來進行對抗。舉例，如果美國今天仍然保留着奴隸法案的話，則今天的美國黑人將處境悲慘，沒有教育，醫療，工作和投票的權利。可以看到，這樣的法律必將引發來自黑人的憤怒，反抗，甚至是戰爭。
參考範文：
Nowadays, there is an assertion that the freedom of citizens should be limited; otherwise it might harm the social laws and justice system, thus making our society unstable. Personally, this view is psychologically right, while it overlooks the importance of fighting against the unfair laws freely.
Firstly, there is no doubt that obeying social rules and laws is the fundamental obligation for all individuals, for the reason that they serve as a key function of ensuring our society running on the right track. Obviously, these regulations define the borders between the right and the wrong, the social ethics and day-to-day conduct standards, all of which can instruct and regulate citizens to act and think in a lawful, polite and safe way. Otherwise, the ignorance of these regulations, or so-called “an absolute freedom”, will trap our society into chaos and even malfunction. For example, if the traffic laws were disrespected, it is expected that all streets and highways will be full of congestions and car crashes caused by wrongdoings in driving like blind over speed or overtaking. Similarly, if the criminal law were absent, then there will be no concern of punishments for committing crimes. Consequently, illegal activities including thefts, robberies, arson, rapes, vandalism and murders will be overwhelming, which will not only place the poverties and lives of the public in the danger, but also destroy today’s civilization in a long term.
However, there is always a justification that people should be allowed to freely question and topple those unfair laws that are the barriers of democracy development. In history, the typical example is the slavery law in America that defined African-Americans as second-class citizens and deprived their rights of public education, health care and vote. If this evil law were just followed, instead of being eradicated through the pursuit of human freedom, we now can predict clearly that current the community of America would be still full of inequity, discrimination, and massive social disorder caused by conflicts between the black and white.
All in all, I agree that it is very necessary to limit the freedom of the public by confining their behaviors in the bounds of social regulation and laws, which is the pre-condition of social democracy and stability. However, when it comes to unjust laws, the public should have the freedom to eliminate them.
(392 words)
雅思寫作範文：判斷孩子犯罪
Task：Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three-year-old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals. To what extent do you think the human nature produces crimes? And how can we prevent children from growing up to be criminals?
思路解析：
1. 基因論是有點道理的。舉例，科學已經證明，某些基因缺陷會導致大腦荷爾蒙的分泌功能紊亂，這會導致人在很小的時候就顯示出負面的性格，如缺乏殘忍，缺乏同情心和負罪感。在長大之後，這些病態的特徵會刺激他們做出暴力的行爲。
2. 然而，父母在塑造孩子思維的過程中同樣起到很大作用。舉例，糟糕的父母管教，如採用暴力來體罰孩子，會讓孩子變得有侵略性，冷漠，以及反社會的思想。
3. 此外，來自媒體的暴力鏡頭同樣會影響孩子們。舉例，電影中人們總是通過犯罪來解決問題，或是獲得財富。這扭曲了孩子們的價值觀，讓他們誤以爲通過犯罪來謀生是合適的。
參考範文：
Does a child’s performance at the age of 3 decide whether he or she would be a criminal in the future? Personally, I partially agree that gene defects in some cases indeed cause some illegal actions, while it is unwise to attribute all crimes to the gene problem, and my reasons will be explored as below.
Admittedly, to the extent of Geneticism, this assertion is reasonable, because some of human behaviors, attitudes and characteristics are determined by DNA, and there is always homeotypical continuity from inappropriate behaviors in childhood to criminality in adulthood. For example, symptoms of gene-based psychological abnormality, which stems from the imbalanced secretion of hormones in brain, can be reflected in the very young age as inattention, restlessness, apathy, the lack of guilt about wrongdoings, and unkindness to other children. In adulthood, there is a high possibility that these morbid emotional traits evolve into anti-social minds--specifically, disregarding of rights of others or rules of society, irresponsibility, aggressive personalities and misperceptions about the right and wrong.
However, I strongly believe this assertion is problematic, for the reason that it completely underestimates more fundamental influences of other aspects on children after their birth. Firstly, parents always play a key role in children’s formative education that directly shapes behaviors, minds and values of them. For example, poor parenting skills in daily life, such as violence and corporal punishment, tend to make personalities of children aggressive and rude, even irritable, which might turn into dangerous behaviors and anti-social minds in adulthood.
Besides, violent contents on the internet, TV programs and video games are also responsible for juvenile crimes. It is because youngsters, unlike adults, are lack of abilities to distinguish right from wrong. Therefore, too much violence in the virtual world could twist the social values of young viewers. As a result, they, more often than not, consider violence as the main or even only way to solve problems, thereby leading to crimes.
In conclusion, there are more factors that might result in delinquencies of the youth than genes, and the impacts from parents and media on children’s growth are bigger than that from DNA.
(360 words)
