雅思閱讀高分技巧

雅思閱讀題型多，內容涉及面廣，只要掌握了正確的閱讀方法，才能夠以最快的速度讀題;審題;答題，這樣才能夠控制好雅思閱讀題的答題速度，才能給難題留出思考的時間來。所以要及時更正自己的學習方法，纔是提高雅思閱讀的關鍵點。下面是小編爲您收集整理的雅思閱讀高分技巧，供大家參考!

生活中，不同文化有不同的觀念，往往帶來認識上的偏差和誤區，這也反映在日常的英語學習。

不同需要有不同的閱讀方法

中國學生習慣於採取細讀的方法進行閱讀，也就是說，從左邊一個字一個字地讀到右邊，再下一行。這樣，速度很慢，而且影響閱讀質量。一來，浪費時間，如果遇到不懂的地方，讀得再慢還是不懂;二來，如果是內容比較淺的話，精力容易分散，閱讀質量反倒不升。

西方學生閱讀時往往更注重於根據不同的閱讀需要採取相對應的閱讀方法來最有效地獲取信息，謀求更好、更到位的理解。

學會提取段落主題句是關鍵

一般中國老師在小學的時候就開始教學生概括段落大意，但是方法是通篇全讀，領悟後自行總結。

西方老師的方法就不一樣，根據西方段落寫作的特點，段落的主旨是通過topicsentence(主題句)凸顯出來的。老師在教學生概括段落大意時，會先教會學生根據段落結構的不同，主題句出現的位置不同去提取主題句，從而得到整段的段落大意。這就和中國學生的閱讀方式有很大的不同了。所以，往往中國學生在做雅思題目時，因爲沒有這種做題的習慣，就往往提取不了段落主題句，通篇全讀好幾遍，依然無法確定其段落大意，以至答錯題或沒法答題了。

考察通過閱讀提取信息能力

雅思閱讀考試是針對同學們出去讀書的實際需要，測試同學不同的通過閱讀獲取信息的閱讀技巧。這些閱讀技巧包括：scanning(查讀)、skimming(略讀)和intensivereading(精讀)。根據不同的題型的具體要求，考生應相對應地用不同的解題方法進行高速解題。

在雅思閱讀考試的過程中，經常會出現很多考生都不知道那些答案是什麼意思，但就可以找到答案的情況出現。因爲，雅思閱讀考試的相當一大部分的側重點是考察考生通過閱讀提取信息的能力，而不是考考生對信息真正領悟的能力。

如果我們用中國閱讀的老辦法來進行雅思閱讀的話，會因爲速度過慢而不能在規定的時間內完成答卷，造成不必要的損失。

學生應學會提高閱讀速度，增強閱讀能力，這樣既能考好雅思考試，也能順當地適應外國留學所需要的大量閱讀。

　　雅思閱讀材料：Mars

雅思閱讀考試中涉及的知識面很廣，有的甚至是同學們平時很少接觸到的信息，比如關於科技類的的雅思閱讀材料，這篇雅思閱讀材料的主要內容是介紹了火星以及科學家登陸火星的一些計劃等等。以下就是詳細內容，供大家參考，希望對大家在衝刺雅思閱讀上能有所幫助。

Missions to Mars: a rocky road to the Red Planet

Missions to Mars may have stalled, but the search for signs of life continues – by analysing the 'DNA' of Martian meteorites, writes Roger Highfield.

雅思閱讀材料：Mars

Are we alone in the cosMos? For centuries, that question has been purely speculative. But in recent years scientists have gathered evidence of alien life on Mars that is as tantalising as it is inconclusive.

We thought we might have a definitive answer in 2003, when Britain's ￡50 million Beagle 2 probe was scheduled to touch down on the Red Planet, carrying an instrument that could have detected traces of living things. But we never heard from the little probe again.

The loss was a massive disappointment to the professor behind the mission, Colin Pillinger of the Open University. During the late Nineties, I had seen him doggedly enlist support for the project from fellow space scientists, the government and even the likes of Blur and the artist Damien Hirst.

The European Space Agency promised Prof Pillinger that there would be a follow-up programme, with a mission as soon as 2007. That date slipped back again and again. The Mars mission is now scheduled for 2018, when a joint mission with Nasa is due to send two rovers to search for life. Towards the end of this year, Nasa will launch the Mars Science Laboratory mission, which will set down a rover called Curiosity that will study whether conditions have ever been favourable for microbial life.

There is, however, another way to answer this giant question. In 1989, Prof Pillinger's team found organic material, typical of that left by the remains of living things on Earth, in a meteorite called EETA79001. This is one of a relatively small number of rocks – fewer than 100 – that chemical analysis reveals must have been blasted off the surface of the Red Planet by an asteroid impact and then subsequently fallen to Earth.

The Open University team stopped short of saying they had discovered life on Mars – but, in 1996, Everett Gibson and his colleagues at Nasa announced that they believed that they had discovered a fossil no bigger than a nanometre in another meteorite, known as ALH84001, which had fallen to Earth roughly 13,000 years ago. Other researchers, studying the data collected by America's Viking landers, which touched down in 1976, concluded that life signs had been detected then, too.

Sceptics – and there are many – remain convinced that inorganic (non-living) processes could have produced the same data and features that have been interpreted by some as signs of microbial life. But how can we even tell these rocks came from Mars?

Well, a few days ago, I found myself back at the Open University, to test another Martian meteorite, which we will offer as a prize to readers of New Scientist in the next issue. I bought it from Luc Labenne, a well-known collector based in France. It was a piece of a rock that crashed into the desert in Algeria, hence the designation NWA2975 ("North-West Africa").

One measure of its rarity is its astonishing value – one 102g sample of the same rock is on sale for $100,000 (our prize is 1.7g). To ensure that it was genuine, I enlisted the help of Prof Pillinger's colleagues. Andy Tindle studied a slide of NWA2975 provided by Ted Bunch of Northern Arizona University, a member of the team who originally described the meteorite in 2005. This revealed a mixture of rounded desert sand grains and various minerals of the kind found on Mars, such as pyroxene, which contains manganese and iron in a ratio typical of the Red Planet.

To make absolutely sure, Richard Greenwood and Jenny Gibson removed around ten-thousandths of a gram for further analysis. Using an instrument called a mass spectrometer (think of it as an atomic weighing machine), they studied the relative abundance in the meteorite's silicate minerals of three isotopes of oxygen – oxygen-16, oxygen-17 and oxygen-18. They were released for analysis with the help of a laser and a powerful reagent.

Because the relative abundance of these isotopes varies throughout the solar system, it is possible to use them like a DNA test in order to identify whether a meteorite comes from the Moon, an asteroid or Mars. In this case, they found a slight excess in the abundance of oxygen-17 and oxygen-18 compared with rocks from Earth, just as we would expect from a Martian rock.

What this tells us is that we don't have to go to Mars to get all kinds of insights into the Red Planet. We can reveal a lot simply by studying its meteorites to reveal data from the composition of the atmosphere to the presence of water. And, of course, these meteorites offer us a welcome opportunity to search for life signs, as we wait for the next mission to land on the planet's dusty, pink surface.

以上就是關於火星以及科學家登陸火星的一些計劃的雅思閱讀材料的全部內容，非常詳細的介紹了相關的話題，大家可以在備考雅思閱讀考試和雅思小作文的時候，對這篇文章進行適當的參考和閱讀。